<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>brainscat.com &#187; open source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainscat.com/topic/computing/development/open-source/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainscat.com</link>
	<description>Tor Bjornrud on tech, media, and miscellany.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 06:09:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tor on Android</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2009/09/16/tor-on-android</link>
		<comments>http://brainscat.com/archives/2009/09/16/tor-on-android#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tor-spotting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pure Java implementation of me was released this Friday on Android.   Thanks to Jamie Rytlewski for pointing this out.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2009/09/15/tor-on-android/">pure Java implementation of me</a> was released this Friday on Android.   Thanks to Jamie Rytlewski for pointing this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brainscat.com/archives/2009/09/16/tor-on-android/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 1.0.4 Released</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/05/12/firefox-104-released</link>
		<comments>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/05/12/firefox-104-released#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 17:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/05/12/firefox-104-released</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upgrade Firefox to 1.0.4.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upgrade <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/">Firefox to 1.0.4</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/05/12/firefox-104-released/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Euro Software Patents: Two Views</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/03/18/euro-software-patents-two-views</link>
		<comments>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/03/18/euro-software-patents-two-views#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/03/18/euro-software-patents-two-views</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a dense argument going on right now over whether or not software will be patentable in Europe.  Not being the most politically educated person on the block, I found this recent overview, rebuttal, and re-rebuttal about the value of software patents quite enlightening.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a dense argument going on right now over whether or not software will be patentable in Europe.  Not being the most politically educated person on the block, I found this recent <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2005/03/08/softwarepatents.html">overview</a>, <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/6634">rebuttal</a>, and <a href="http://wiki.ffii.org/Epstein050309En">re-rebuttal</a> about the value of software patents quite enlightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/03/18/euro-software-patents-two-views/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tim Bray on Linux and Patents</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/08/06/tim-bray-on-linux-and-patents</link>
		<comments>http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/08/06/tim-bray-on-linux-and-patents#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 19:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/08/06/tim-bray-on-linux-and-patents</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Bray throws together an excellent summary and analysis regarding the recent claims that Linux infringes 283 patents recently put forth by OSRM.  Tim gives the real deal and puts things into perspective.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tbray.org/ongoing/">Tim Bray</a> throws together an <a href="http://tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/08/05/LinuxPatents">excellent summary and analysis</a> regarding the recent claims that <a href="http://news.com.com/Group%3A+Linux+potentially+infringes+283+patents/2100-7344_3-5291403.html?tag=nefd.top">Linux infringes 283 patents</a> recently put forth by <a href="http://www.osriskmanagement.com/">OSRM</a>.  Tim gives the real deal and puts things into perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/08/06/tim-bray-on-linux-and-patents/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mono 1.0 Released!</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/06/30/mono-10-released</link>
		<comments>http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/06/30/mono-10-released#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/06/30/mono-10-released</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mono, the Open Source .Net Framework, is finally at a 1.0 release after three years.  They&#8217;ve even completely redone their webpage and repackaged Mono into almost any form you like.  Grabbing the OS X version now&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mono-project.com/about/index.html">Mono, the Open Source .Net Framework</a>, is finally at a 1.0 release after three years.  They&#8217;ve even completely redone their webpage and repackaged Mono into almost any form you like.  Grabbing the OS X version now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/06/30/mono-10-released/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for alternative to Photos</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/06/29/looking-for-alternative-to-photos</link>
		<comments>http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/06/29/looking-for-alternative-to-photos#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/06/29/looking-for-alternative-to-photos</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently started looking for some high quality photo management software that&#8217;s web accessable, Free, and written in PHP.  Photos  by Alex King looked to be the most promising but doesn&#8217;t have all the features I&#8217;d like.  &#8220;No worries,&#8221; I thought, &#8220;I&#8217;ll just add a patch for what I want.&#8221;
Well, it turns [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently started looking for some high quality photo management software that&#8217;s web accessable, Free, and written in <a href="http://php.net">PHP</a>.  <a href="http://www.alexking.org/index.php?content=software/photos/content.php">Photos </a> by Alex King looked to be the most promising but doesn&#8217;t have all the features I&#8217;d like.  &#8220;No worries,&#8221; I thought, &#8220;I&#8217;ll just add a patch for what I want.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it turns out the license allows you to change your copy all you like, but you can&#8217;t redistribute his code with your changes, and if you give your patches to him, they become property and copyright of <a href="http://alexking.org">Alex King</a>.  Undeterred, I figured I&#8217;d at least give a shot at trying to plead with Alex to change his license.  The emails went cordially enough and no hard feelings are to be had, and he has his reasons for keeping the license as it is.  I wouldn&#8217;t be forthcoming though, if I didn&#8217;t say I was dissapointed. C&#8217;est la vie.</p>
<p>Alas, the search continues, and I&#8217;m looking for a decent photo organization suite.  There&#8217;s been some talk about using the digital object repositories (Repos or ProjectBuilder) we&#8217;ve built here at work, but those are probably my last resort as they&#8217;re quite bulky and suited for a more broad collection.  Again, I need something with a Free license as I&#8217;m pretty sure nothing out there will do <strong>all</strong> the things I&#8217;d like, so modifying it will be a must.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/06/29/looking-for-alternative-to-photos/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 0.9 Out</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/06/21/firefox-09-out</link>
		<comments>http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/06/21/firefox-09-out#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/06/21/firefox-09-out</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one got a bit lost as I was gone for the weekend&#8230;
Mozilla Firefox 0.9 (One Tree Hill) is out.   Firefox is a Free web browser for all platforms that respects web standards, runs fast, and has a great user interface.

New user interface.
Kills some plugins on upgrade, but they can be reinstalled.
Icon in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one got a bit lost as I was gone for the weekend&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/releases/">Mozilla Firefox 0.9 (One Tree Hill)</a> is out.   Firefox is a <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html">Free</a> web browser for all platforms that respects web standards, runs fast, and has a great user interface.</p>
<ul>
<li>New user interface.</li>
<li>Kills some plugins on upgrade, but they can be reinstalled.</li>
<li>Icon in OS X doesn&#8217;t show up in dock. :( [<em>Update: restart fixes this</em>]</li>
</ul>
<p>Make sure you pick up the <a href="http://www.chrispederick.com/work/firefox/webdeveloper/">WebDeveloper</a> and <a href="http://fls.moo.jp/moz/rssreader.html">RSS Reader Panel</a> extensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brainscat.com/archives/2004/06/21/firefox-09-out/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
