<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Switching&#8230; Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again</link>
	<description>Tor Bjornrud's views on tech, media, and miscellany.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-11722</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-11722</guid>
		<description>I would switch to mac if I had some money but since the windows sector is so big there is a much variety of software. 

Die-hard Mac fans say its not the quantity but the quality i.e. it does not matter if there is a big variety, as long as the limited set of choices are quality software. 

However, in the real world a big variety DOES breed quality - it opens up competition and comparisons, which helps improve software efficiently at lower costs (for example the amonut of quality freeware available to windows compared to mac). 

This brings to another point, no matter which way you look at it, there IS a premium that you have to pay for a mac. I reckon for macs to really get more convertors they will have to change their business model and allow MUCH more freedom of licences for their software. That's my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would switch to mac if I had some money but since the windows sector is so big there is a much variety of software. </p>
<p>Die-hard Mac fans say its not the quantity but the quality i.e. it does not matter if there is a big variety, as long as the limited set of choices are quality software. </p>
<p>However, in the real world a big variety DOES breed quality - it opens up competition and comparisons, which helps improve software efficiently at lower costs (for example the amonut of quality freeware available to windows compared to mac). </p>
<p>This brings to another point, no matter which way you look at it, there IS a premium that you have to pay for a mac. I reckon for macs to really get more convertors they will have to change their business model and allow MUCH more freedom of licences for their software. That&#8217;s my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Har&#8217;s Site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Switched Back?</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8373</link>
		<dc:creator>Har&#8217;s Site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Switched Back?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8373</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s a post from someone who switched back to Windows. Another one here. I don&#8217;t hear these stories very often, so it&#8217;s interesting to hear the reasons. Magnus links to these posts and points out the subjective nature of the complaints. Yeah, it amazes me how different people are. My experience using Macs has been just the opposite. The Macs I use never crash. I leave my iMac running 24/7; run all manner of software. No problems. My experience with Windows&#8230;well&#8230;my corporate laptop running Win2k occassionally crashes (BSOD) before I can login, and that&#8217;s just the beginning. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s a post from someone who switched back to Windows. Another one here. I don&#8217;t hear these stories very often, so it&#8217;s interesting to hear the reasons. Magnus links to these posts and points out the subjective nature of the complaints. Yeah, it amazes me how different people are. My experience using Macs has been just the opposite. The Macs I use never crash. I leave my iMac running 24/7; run all manner of software. No problems. My experience with Windows&#8230;well&#8230;my corporate laptop running Win2k occassionally crashes (BSOD) before I can login, and that&#8217;s just the beginning. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manzi</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8372</link>
		<dc:creator>Manzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8372</guid>
		<description>Welcome back to the bandwagon of excitement!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to the bandwagon of excitement!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tor</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8371</link>
		<dc:creator>tor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 03:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8371</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Joe&lt;/strong&gt;, sorry.  I decided long ago to use nothing but IMAP for all of my mail so that I can use any client anywhere and not worry about a thing.

&lt;strong&gt;Krishna&lt;/strong&gt;, just took a look at Super Duper.  First off it's not free, which throws it off my list, and secondly it, as you say, doesn't automate.  Those are show stoppers for me.

&lt;strong&gt;William&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for taking the time to respond.  Sadly, Backup doesn't serve my needs at all since the Apple site you directed me to says it needs a .Mac account which I won't pay for.  Ink if it requires an acessory is totally not going to work for me.  The games I want to play aren't ported to OS X.

Thanks for the tip of the Audiovox phone though. I just read on the box it supported WMA and MP3 and that was it.  Though, I won't pay for sync software and it also looks like OBEX will be too slow.   A cursory search said it was designed for IrDA and Bluetooth, which are way too slow to transfer a gig of music every morning.

As for the music service, I understand it works for a lot of people.  Just not me.  The way I use it, I get way more bang for the same dollar.  I'm going to have to slighly disagree with you on the value of the OS X release cycle.  I know it's faster and there are improvements, but in sum I don't think they're worth the extra money, which incedentally *is* more than a comparable one time $300 Windows license.  Then again, for many people, these features are worth the difference.  They might be in the future to me, but in my experience they haven't been.  Thankfully, my employer subsidised my previous upgrades.

Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Joe</strong>, sorry.  I decided long ago to use nothing but IMAP for all of my mail so that I can use any client anywhere and not worry about a thing.</p>
<p><strong>Krishna</strong>, just took a look at Super Duper.  First off it&#8217;s not free, which throws it off my list, and secondly it, as you say, doesn&#8217;t automate.  Those are show stoppers for me.</p>
<p><strong>William</strong>, thanks for taking the time to respond.  Sadly, Backup doesn&#8217;t serve my needs at all since the Apple site you directed me to says it needs a .Mac account which I won&#8217;t pay for.  Ink if it requires an acessory is totally not going to work for me.  The games I want to play aren&#8217;t ported to OS X.</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip of the Audiovox phone though. I just read on the box it supported WMA and MP3 and that was it.  Though, I won&#8217;t pay for sync software and it also looks like OBEX will be too slow.   A cursory search said it was designed for IrDA and Bluetooth, which are way too slow to transfer a gig of music every morning.</p>
<p>As for the music service, I understand it works for a lot of people.  Just not me.  The way I use it, I get way more bang for the same dollar.  I&#8217;m going to have to slighly disagree with you on the value of the OS X release cycle.  I know it&#8217;s faster and there are improvements, but in sum I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re worth the extra money, which incedentally *is* more than a comparable one time $300 Windows license.  Then again, for many people, these features are worth the difference.  They might be in the future to me, but in my experience they haven&#8217;t been.  Thankfully, my employer subsidised my previous upgrades.</p>
<p>Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Reading</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8370</link>
		<dc:creator>William Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 02:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8370</guid>
		<description>Well, both platforms have their uses, though I might point out these things:

1) Mac OS X does have handwriting recognition. In fact, it's even called Ink :-). You just plug in a tablet and you're good to go. Granted, it's not integrated, but I suppose it depends on how you take notes.

2) There are a fair amount of games ported over to Mac OS X, but if you really want to run games, then I'll give that Windows seems to be better for that. I personally don't find myself playing games/online poker, etc.

3) It's actually pretty easy. There's an application called Backup.app that lets you do it. (http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/apple/backup.html)

4) My Windows Mobile phone (SMT5600) plays AAC audio just fine. If you don't mind paying for it, The Missing Sync will also synchronize music from iTunes directly to it as well. If you don't like that, you can always mount the media from the phone or drag and drop onto it using OBEX file push, etc.

5) Mac OS X is also on much faster release cycles. If you do a retail price comparison for how much Windows XP Pro vs. Mac OS X 10.4 runs, it's almost the same. I'll agree that there doesn't seem to be a subscription service equivalent to Yahoo's on the Mac, but I personally don't like subscription DRM'd music myself. It seems like too much of a tease.

That said, I keep a Windows Box around for a few things like that, though I generally bring the Powerbook around with me just because it's lightweight, has good battery life and I like the formfactor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, both platforms have their uses, though I might point out these things:</p>
<p>1) Mac OS X does have handwriting recognition. In fact, it&#8217;s even called Ink :-). You just plug in a tablet and you&#8217;re good to go. Granted, it&#8217;s not integrated, but I suppose it depends on how you take notes.</p>
<p>2) There are a fair amount of games ported over to Mac OS X, but if you really want to run games, then I&#8217;ll give that Windows seems to be better for that. I personally don&#8217;t find myself playing games/online poker, etc.</p>
<p>3) It&#8217;s actually pretty easy. There&#8217;s an application called Backup.app that lets you do it. (http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/apple/backup.html)</p>
<p>4) My Windows Mobile phone (SMT5600) plays AAC audio just fine. If you don&#8217;t mind paying for it, The Missing Sync will also synchronize music from iTunes directly to it as well. If you don&#8217;t like that, you can always mount the media from the phone or drag and drop onto it using OBEX file push, etc.</p>
<p>5) Mac OS X is also on much faster release cycles. If you do a retail price comparison for how much Windows XP Pro vs. Mac OS X 10.4 runs, it&#8217;s almost the same. I&#8217;ll agree that there doesn&#8217;t seem to be a subscription service equivalent to Yahoo&#8217;s on the Mac, but I personally don&#8217;t like subscription DRM&#8217;d music myself. It seems like too much of a tease.</p>
<p>That said, I keep a Windows Box around for a few things like that, though I generally bring the Powerbook around with me just because it&#8217;s lightweight, has good battery life and I like the formfactor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Evitt's Blog</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8369</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Evitt's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 01:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8369</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Links - 09/26/05&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Links - 09/26/05</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krishna</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8368</link>
		<dc:creator>Krishna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8368</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at &lt;a href="http://www.shirt-pocket.com"&gt;SuperDuper&lt;/a&gt; on the Mac side, for back-ups? It doesn't do automated back-ups (yet), but makes the process of backing up so much easier. Give it a whirl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at <a href="http://www.shirt-pocket.com">SuperDuper</a> on the Mac side, for back-ups? It doesn&#8217;t do automated back-ups (yet), but makes the process of backing up so much easier. Give it a whirl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8367</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8367</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Have you found a good method for exporting your old mail from os x mail to outlook?

Seems os x mail doesn't play well with others even entourage.

Any advice would be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Have you found a good method for exporting your old mail from os x mail to outlook?</p>
<p>Seems os x mail doesn&#8217;t play well with others even entourage.</p>
<p>Any advice would be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tor</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8366</link>
		<dc:creator>tor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 18:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8366</guid>
		<description>Dear "me".

First off, I'd take you a lot more seriously if you weren't an AC.  Nonetheless, I'll bite your bait.

1.  I have yet to find any good, easy, incremental *free* mature software for the Mac that's easy to use.  I could have written a script to use rsync, but that's not what I'd call easy.  I'm all ears as to what app does a good job of it, and an explanation about how easy it was to find.  Compare it to the 10 minutes it takes to setup an automated incremental backup in Windows XP...

2. I prefer Picasa.  Better tag support, better original image integrity, and better auto-find support.

3. What's your alternative to Yahoo! Music? You say it's a joke but you don't back anything up at all.  It's a plain and simple fact that for the type of use I do day in and out with my music iTunes doesn't even hold a candle to the value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear &#8220;me&#8221;.</p>
<p>First off, I&#8217;d take you a lot more seriously if you weren&#8217;t an AC.  Nonetheless, I&#8217;ll bite your bait.</p>
<p>1.  I have yet to find any good, easy, incremental *free* mature software for the Mac that&#8217;s easy to use.  I could have written a script to use rsync, but that&#8217;s not what I&#8217;d call easy.  I&#8217;m all ears as to what app does a good job of it, and an explanation about how easy it was to find.  Compare it to the 10 minutes it takes to setup an automated incremental backup in Windows XP&#8230;</p>
<p>2. I prefer Picasa.  Better tag support, better original image integrity, and better auto-find support.</p>
<p>3. What&#8217;s your alternative to Yahoo! Music? You say it&#8217;s a joke but you don&#8217;t back anything up at all.  It&#8217;s a plain and simple fact that for the type of use I do day in and out with my music iTunes doesn&#8217;t even hold a candle to the value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8365</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8365</guid>
		<description>Wow.  You have no idea how to automate backups on a Mac?  There are a bunch of apps that do that very well and they are very easy to find.  You could not have tried very hard.  Thats true of apps in general on the Mac.  Anyone who says there aren't enough apps for the Mac didn't look.  Comparing Picassa to iPhoto?  What a joke. Your going wiht Microsoft and a sub based service and say your going to "own your media"?  Puh-lease.  You don't have a single good point here and have no credibility as a result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  You have no idea how to automate backups on a Mac?  There are a bunch of apps that do that very well and they are very easy to find.  You could not have tried very hard.  Thats true of apps in general on the Mac.  Anyone who says there aren&#8217;t enough apps for the Mac didn&#8217;t look.  Comparing Picassa to iPhoto?  What a joke. Your going wiht Microsoft and a sub based service and say your going to &#8220;own your media&#8221;?  Puh-lease.  You don&#8217;t have a single good point here and have no credibility as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Ayers, Raw Blog : &#187; Hardware</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8364</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Ayers, Raw Blog : &#187; Hardware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8364</guid>
		<description>[...] Typically I&#8217;ve just encountered posts talking of &#8220;switching back&#8221; - Russell Beattie, Tor Bjornrud stitched together by Scoble. Some of the points might put me off if I was looking for a do-everything machine, but I couldn&#8217;t see any showstoppers for my purposes. The MS vs. Apple points don&#8217;t work for me, my alternative would be some kind of cheap generic Intel thing with Ubuntu, WinXP holds no attractions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Typically I&#8217;ve just encountered posts talking of &#8220;switching back&#8221; - Russell Beattie, Tor Bjornrud stitched together by Scoble. Some of the points might put me off if I was looking for a do-everything machine, but I couldn&#8217;t see any showstoppers for my purposes. The MS vs. Apple points don&#8217;t work for me, my alternative would be some kind of cheap generic Intel thing with Ubuntu, WinXP holds no attractions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmiessler.com &#187; Someone Switching From OS X to Windows</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8363</link>
		<dc:creator>dmiessler.com &#187; Someone Switching From OS X to Windows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8363</guid>
		<description>[...] So this guy is switching back from Mac to PC. He actually has some good points, actually, and as with all purely personal decisions there isn&#8217;t really a wrong answer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So this guy is switching back from Mac to PC. He actually has some good points, actually, and as with all purely personal decisions there isn&#8217;t really a wrong answer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Win32Dev</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8362</link>
		<dc:creator>Win32Dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 08:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8362</guid>
		<description>Except of course that with Yahoo Music Unlimited you don't actually own your media -- you perpetually rent it from Yahoo. Napster's similar, but they do offer a choice to own outright (IIRC).

That said, I do think OSX is overrated, and Windows receives many more knocks than it deserves. Welcome back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except of course that with Yahoo Music Unlimited you don&#8217;t actually own your media &#8212; you perpetually rent it from Yahoo. Napster&#8217;s similar, but they do offer a choice to own outright (IIRC).</p>
<p>That said, I do think OSX is overrated, and Windows receives many more knocks than it deserves. Welcome back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: intodimensions.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Switching&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://brainscat.com/archives/2005/09/25/switching-again#comment-8361</link>
		<dc:creator>intodimensions.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Switching&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 06:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainscat.com/?p=305#comment-8361</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s been some people writing about switching from Mac to Windows lately. Russell Beattie listed a number of reasons why he&#8217;s considering switching to Windows, and Tor Bjornrud says he&#8217;s already switched. Most of the reasons they give for switching (or considering switching) are subjective and personal reasons. I&#8217;m not disputing that they feel like they do, but if you read their resons remember they are for the most part not absolute and objective. Tor writes, for example, that &#8220;OS X is too narrow of a platform for developers to try and target, and consequently too frustratingly small of a sandbox to work in. It’s a sad but true reality.&#8221; If you look at the wealth of small/independent OS X developers and the high-class software they develop, I don&#8217;t think you can say it&#8217;s as easy as a &#8220;true reality.&#8221; Russell writes that he dislikes iPhoto, &#8220;don&#8217;t like Mail or Safari&#8221;, &#8220;don&#8217;t use iMovie&#8221;, &#8220;hate the Dock&#8221;, Expose is &#8220;nuts&#8221;, and Dashboard is &#8220;pretty useless&#8221;. Those might be his views, and that&#8217;s fair enough, but they are certainly not everyones. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s been some people writing about switching from Mac to Windows lately. Russell Beattie listed a number of reasons why he&#8217;s considering switching to Windows, and Tor Bjornrud says he&#8217;s already switched. Most of the reasons they give for switching (or considering switching) are subjective and personal reasons. I&#8217;m not disputing that they feel like they do, but if you read their resons remember they are for the most part not absolute and objective. Tor writes, for example, that &#8220;OS X is too narrow of a platform for developers to try and target, and consequently too frustratingly small of a sandbox to work in. It’s a sad but true reality.&#8221; If you look at the wealth of small/independent OS X developers and the high-class software they develop, I don&#8217;t think you can say it&#8217;s as easy as a &#8220;true reality.&#8221; Russell writes that he dislikes iPhoto, &#8220;don&#8217;t like Mail or Safari&#8221;, &#8220;don&#8217;t use iMovie&#8221;, &#8220;hate the Dock&#8221;, Expose is &#8220;nuts&#8221;, and Dashboard is &#8220;pretty useless&#8221;. Those might be his views, and that&#8217;s fair enough, but they are certainly not everyones. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
